All sections · Part V: Shares · Sub-Part IV: Distributions
72 ソルベンシーテスト不合格時に行われた分配金の回収
(1) 会社が会員に対して分配を行ったが、分配直後に会社が支払能力テストを満たさなかった場合、以下の場合に限り、会社はその分配（またはその価値）を会員から回収することができる。
(a) 会員が、企業がソルベンシーテストに不合格であることを知らずに、誠意をもって以外に、分配金または分配金の利益（もしあれば）を受け取った場合。
(b) 配布物の有効性に依拠することで、会員の立場が変化していないこと。
(c) 全額返済、または全く返済しないことを要求することが不公平ではないこと。
(2) 会社がメンバーに対して分配を行ったが、分配直後に会社が支払能力テストを満たさなかった場合、第70条、プロテクション・セル会社の場合は第71条に従って分配が行われたことを確認するための合理的な措置を講じなかった取締役は、メンバーから回収できない分配の一部を会社に返済する個人的責任を負うものとする。
(3) 本節に基づく取締役または構成員に対する訴訟において、裁判所が、会社がより少額の分配を行うことにより支払能力テストを満たすことができたと認める場合、裁判所は-。
(a) メンバーの残留を許可する。
(b) 取締役は、適切に行われたはずの分配の価値に相当する額についての責任を免れる。
サブセクションV-自己株式の償還および取得
(a) 会員が、企業がソルベンシーテストに不合格であることを知らずに、誠意をもって以外に、分配金または分配金の利益（もしあれば）を受け取った場合。
(b) 配布物の有効性に依拠することで、会員の立場が変化していないこと。
(c) 全額返済、または全く返済しないことを要求することが不公平ではないこと。
(2) 会社がメンバーに対して分配を行ったが、分配直後に会社が支払能力テストを満たさなかった場合、第70条、プロテクション・セル会社の場合は第71条に従って分配が行われたことを確認するための合理的な措置を講じなかった取締役は、メンバーから回収できない分配の一部を会社に返済する個人的責任を負うものとする。
(3) 本節に基づく取締役または構成員に対する訴訟において、裁判所が、会社がより少額の分配を行うことにより支払能力テストを満たすことができたと認める場合、裁判所は-。
(a) メンバーの残留を許可する。
(b) 取締役は、適切に行われたはずの分配の価値に相当する額についての責任を免れる。
サブセクションV-自己株式の償還および取得
Translation for information only. Only the English original is legally binding.
Original wording (English, legally binding): Recovery of distributions made when company did not satisfy solvency test
(1) Where a distribution has been made to a member by a company and the
company did not, immediately after the distribution, satisfy the solvency
when company did not
test, then the distribution (or the value thereof) may be recovered by the
company from the member but only if —
(a) the member received the distribution or the benefit of the
distribution (as the case maybe) other than in good faith and
without knowledge of the company‘s failure to satisfy the solvency
test;
(b) the member‘s position has not been altered by the member relying
on the validity of the distribution; and
(c) it would not be unfair to require repayment in full or at all.
(2) Where a distribution has been made to a member or members by a
company and the company did not, immediately after the distribution,
satisfy the solvency test, then, a director who failed to take reasonable steps
to ensure that the distribution was made in accordance with section 70, or,
in the case of a protected cell company, section 71, shall be personally
liable to the company to repay to the company so much of the distribution
as is not able to be recovered from members.
(3) If, in an action brought against a director or member under this section, the
Court is satisfied that the company could, by making a distribution of a
lesser amount, have satisfied the solvency test, the Court may —
(a) permit the member to retain; or
(b) relieve the director from liability in respect of, an amount equal
to the value of any distribution that could properly have been
made.
company did not, immediately after the distribution, satisfy the solvency
when company did not
test, then the distribution (or the value thereof) may be recovered by the
company from the member but only if —
(a) the member received the distribution or the benefit of the
distribution (as the case maybe) other than in good faith and
without knowledge of the company‘s failure to satisfy the solvency
test;
(b) the member‘s position has not been altered by the member relying
on the validity of the distribution; and
(c) it would not be unfair to require repayment in full or at all.
(2) Where a distribution has been made to a member or members by a
company and the company did not, immediately after the distribution,
satisfy the solvency test, then, a director who failed to take reasonable steps
to ensure that the distribution was made in accordance with section 70, or,
in the case of a protected cell company, section 71, shall be personally
liable to the company to repay to the company so much of the distribution
as is not able to be recovered from members.
(3) If, in an action brought against a director or member under this section, the
Court is satisfied that the company could, by making a distribution of a
lesser amount, have satisfied the solvency test, the Court may —
(a) permit the member to retain; or
(b) relieve the director from liability in respect of, an amount equal
to the value of any distribution that could properly have been
made.
